NLWC News


NLWC 2024 Annual Town Meeting Recommendations

Anna Day • May 20, 2024

Nantucket’s community depends on the vitality of its sustainable natural resources.


2024 Annual Town Meeting
Tuesday, May 7th at 5:00 PM
Nantucket High School Auditorium


VOTE ENVIRONMENT FIRST

The Nantucket Land & Water Council has reviewed the Warrant for the May 7th 2024, Annual Town Meeting and offers the following recommendations on articles which could affect the island’s unique and valuable natural resources and quality of life.

For more information on the Annual Town Meeting and for a copy of the Warrant and relevant maps, please visit the Town website HERE.


Article 42 NO Zoning Bylaw Amendment: Flex Development – Open Space Protection
This proposed amendment is unclear as drafted and could be interpreted to allow the Planning Board to waive the permanent restriction to protect open space that is intended in the Bylaw.

Read more information on Article 42 by clicking here

Watch NLWC Executive Director speak about Article 42 at the Nantucket Civic League’s Meet the Articles on April 6, 2024. 
Time Stamp: 46:07 through 51:27

Article 43 NO Zoning Bylaw Amendment: Rear Lot Subdivision
This amendment would enable the Planning Board to grant a Special Permit for a Rear Lot Subdivision without having to formally endorse an Approval Not Required subdivision plan. It unreasonably eliminates an important regulatory check which has always been a prerequisite for this type of subdivision.

Article 45 YES Zoning Bylaw Amendment: Moorlands Management District (MMD) Pool Prohibition
This article would prohibit pools and outdoor residential recreational water features from the MMD, which are currently allowed by Special Permit. This district was created in the 1980’s to protect and preserve the scenic and ecological integrity of the moorlands in the Smooth Hummocks and Head of the Plains areas. Pools are inconsistent with the underlying purpose of the fragile MMD.

Read more information on Article 45 by clicking here.

Article 50 YES Zoning Map Change: Open Space Parcels – Various
This article appropriately changes the zoning of several open space properties, increasing the minimum lot size to the greatest extent possible within the respective Town or Country Overlay District.

Article 53 NO Zoning Map Change: LUG-2 to R-20 – 25 Rugged Road
This unusual zoning change for only a portion of a single lot, would create a new market rate lot where zoning does not currently permit one, by decreasing minimum lot size from 80,000 sq ft to 20,000 sq ft. This change would also require an isolated conversion of Country District into Town District, contrary to the Master Plan designation. Alternatively, this lot is currently eligible for the creation of secondary and tertiary residential lots through the covenant program, which would be disincentivized if this article is passed.

Article 59 NO Zoning Bylaw Amendment: Definitions and Word Usage/Residential Rental Use
This article is identical to the previously-defeated Article 42 at the 2022 ATM and Article 2 at the 2023 STM. This Article should be defeated again because it would legalize unlimited commercial STRs as a primary use for houses in all of our residential districts across the island. Once this right is granted under zoning it cannot be taken away. The proliferation of commercial STRs in residential districts threatens the island’s natural resources and infrastructure. Moreover, recent court rulings have confirmed that STRs are a commercial use that is not legal in residential districts. NLWC supports allowing STRs as an accessory use in residential districts. This would ensure all Nantucket residents have the ability to short-term rent their homes so long as they are using their home primarily as a residence. This would prevent commercial/investor-owned STRs in residential neighborhoods.
Please vote NO on Article 59.

Read more information on Article 59 by clicking here.

Article 60 NO General Bylaw Amendment: Definitions and Word Usage/Residential Rental Use
The Fin Com recommendation for this article is purported to be a compromise. But it does not advance balanced limitations on STRs that will protect our Island from increased intensity of use and measurable impact on our natural resources and infrastructure. Nor does it limit STRs to Nantucket residents, but instead contains large loopholes (referring to “other legal entities”) for STRs for commercial purposes owned by corporations and outside investors. It even tries to acknowledge all existing commercial STRs as lawful even though recent court rulings have held they are not (see Section K and “Continue to permit the operation of STRs…”). Finally, it attempts to regulate use and ownership of properties through a General Bylaw provision when such limitations can lawfully be addressed only through a Zoning Bylaw provision. This Article should be defeated.

Article 61 & 62 NO General Bylaw Amendment: Short-Term Rentals
Articles 61 & 62 contain the same loopholes permitting new commercial STRs owned by corporations and outside investors. They suggest incorrectly that the operation of STRs as a primary use in all our residential districts is currently legal under zoning (including the stated purpose and intent to “Continue to permit the operation of STRs…”). It is not. These articles also attempt to regulate the use and ownership of properties through a General Bylaw provision when such limitations can lawfully be addressed only through a Zoning Bylaw provision. Article 61 would enable any structure that has received a Certificate of Occupancy to operate as an STR in the future, which has the potential to dramatically increase the number of full time commercial STRs across residential districts on Nantucket. Article 62 attempts to limit ownership of STRs to 2 units per natural person, which will not impose enough of a limitation on the creation of new STRs as an investment. These Articles should both be defeated.

Article 67 & 69 YES Home Rule Petition and Bylaw: Coastal Resilience District
These articles would enable the Town to create Coastal Resilience Districts to support ongoing efforts towards coastal resiliency. This important tool will significantly increase the Town’s capacity to implement and accomplish the goals and objectives of our Coastal Resilience Plan.

Article 68 NO Real Estate: Lease/License of Baxter Road Property for Erosion Control
This article as drafted is unnecessarily vague and open-ended. It would issue a blank check for the beach to be utilized for construction of any coastal engineering structures on Sconset Beach forever into the future. It has no time frame, no limits on the type of structures, or their location, undermining the intent of Chapter 67-1E, which requires a Town Meeting vote to authorize the duration, location, and type of structures on Town owned land.

Read more information on Article 68 by clicking here.
Watch NLWC Executive Director speak about Article 68 at the Nantucket Civic League’s Meet the Articles on April 6, 2024. 
Time Stamp: 29:58 through 35:00

 

Article 72 NO Bylaw Amendment: Repeal Chapter 141: Stretch Energy Code
This article would eliminate important local legislation that requires building with higher energy efficiency and savings than our Building Code. Nantucket should be improving energy efficiency, not reducing it.

Article 74 YES No Town Funds: Surfside Crossing
We support this article based on the significance and history of this project. If there is an opportunity for the Town to participate in a meaningful way that benefits the public, it can be brought to Town Meeting in the future.

Article 79 YES Home Rule Petition: Community Housing Bank Real Estate Transfer Fee
This article will create a funding source for affordable housing similar to the Land Bank fee structure.

Article 83 YES Home Rule Petition: An Act Regulating the Application of Fertilizer
NLWC supports the intent of this article allowing Nantucket to amend and improve existing fertilizer regulations. We continue to advocate for and support education, implementation and enforcement of the existing regulations.


By Anna Day October 2, 2025
Last week, the appeal hearing for the Surfside Crossing 40B development was conducted remotely by the state’s Housing Appeals Committee (HAC). The NLWC participated as an intervening party to defend clean drinking water for Nantucket. The proposed 156 condo unit development on 13.6 acres known as Surfside Crossing (SSX) off of South Shore Rd is of inappropriate density (13 x the local zoning) and would compromise our drinking water supply. Following the comprehensive permit review by the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) that took place throughout last fall and winter, the application for SSX was unanimously denied by the ZBA. This denial was subsequently appealed to the state by the developers, Jamie Feeley and Josh Posner, in April of this year. During the comprehensive permit review last year by the ZBA, the NLWC hired an engineering expert and water quality specialist to review the project’s stormwater management plans. The review and testimony of these experts revealed that the stormwater infrastructure proposed for the Surfside Crossing development does not meet the specific state and local standards for projects within the Nantucket Wellhead Protection District (the area where groundwater contributes to the public water supply wells), or for projects that meet the state’s criteria as a Land Use of Higher Potential Pollutant Load (LUHPPL). Given recent public well contamination by elevated PFAS levels, it has become abundantly clear that these standards are incredibly important to uphold, especially for a project of this scale within our public water supply recharge area. The local ZBA agreed with the importance of protecting clean water , and asked the developers to address the stormwater management design to ensure that it meets state and local standards and protects not only the residents and direct abutters of the development, but the public water supply that we all share. Unfortunately, the developers refused to make any changes to their proposed design, in part because it would require a reduction in the number of units to make the necessary changes, and in part because they have already installed their stormwater infrastructure, “at risk”, without the benefit of a permit, and without a water quality certificate issued by the Water Commission as required in Nantucket’s Zoning Bylaw. They simply do not want to have to take it back out of the ground. Based on concerns for the health of the community’s drinking water, as well as other concerns relative to public safety and traffic, and considering the developers’ refusal to consider any changes whatsoever to their proposal, the ZBA unanimously denied the project. As an intervening party in the developers’ appeal of the ZBA’s decision, he NLWC has been working closely with the counsel for the Town of Nantucket’s ZBA, and the residents group, Tipping Point, to file written testimony from the NLWC’s engineer, the ZBA’s engineer, and several water quality and PFAS subject matter experts. During the HAC hearing last week, the developers’ counsel chose not to cross-examine any of these witnesses, and so their written testimony stands unchallenged, leaving the hearing office no basis to question their expert opinions. This hearing on the Surfside Crossing matter follows a similar appeal by developers in the Town of Walpole for a Chapter 40B development that was also denied by the Town’s ZBA due to similar concerns over improperly designed stormwater infrastructure, and the degradation of the Town of Walpole’s public water supply. As we await a decision from the HAC, we are grateful to Nantucket’s ZBA for their due diligence during the public hearing process, and for the opportunity to prepare for the appeal hearing in partnership with Town Counsel for the ZBA, as well as the residents’ group Tipping Point.  Stay Tuned for Updates!
By Anna Day July 31, 2025
In April 2025, the Nantucket Land & Water Council (NLWC) joined over a dozen Nantucket residents —including members of the Nantucket Coastal Conservancy, property owners in Quidnet, and the Greenhill family—in filing a Request for a Superseding Order of Conditions (SOC) with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP). This action was taken in response to the positive Order of Conditions issued by the Nantucket Conservation Commission on March 20, 2025, which approved a three fold expansion of the ’Sconset Bluff Geotube project.
By Anna Day July 30, 2025
If you're concerned about PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in your drinking water, filtering your water is an easy step you can take to reduce exposure. There are effective filtration options that can significantly reduce PFAS levels in your tap water.  Below, we've outlined a few types of filters that are known to reduce PFAS, along with the certification to look out for, to help you choose the right one for your needs and budget.
MORE NEWS